<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Vibe-Coding on Raja Sleem</title><link>https://www.rajasleem.com/tags/vibe-coding/</link><description>Recent content in Vibe-Coding on Raja Sleem</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 09:00:00 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.rajasleem.com/tags/vibe-coding/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Vibe Coding Is Not a Yes or No Question</title><link>https://www.rajasleem.com/posts/vibe-coding-is-not-a-yes-or-no-question/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 09:00:00 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://www.rajasleem.com/posts/vibe-coding-is-not-a-yes-or-no-question/</guid><description>I had a hunch the vibe coding debate was all blanket verdicts. So I counted 51 takes before publishing mine. I was half wrong, and the half I was wrong about made the real pattern more interesting.</description></item></channel></rss>